Editor-in-Chief Emeritus Pick of Papers
Free access for our readers
For each issue of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Editor-in-Chief Emeritus Jens Overgaard, picks his favourite papers.
- For unbiased comparison of different radiation modalities and techniques, consensus on delineation of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs) and on their dose constraints is warranted. Following the publication of a digital, online atlas for OAR delineation in neuro-oncology by the same group, we assessed the brain OAR-dose constraints in a follow-up study.
- To create a digital, online atlas for organs at risk (OAR) delineation in neuro-oncology based on high-quality computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
- To update literature-based recommendations for techniques used in high-precision thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer, in both routine practice and clinical trials.
- In the last decade, many efforts have been made to characterize anatomic changes of head and neck organs at risk (OARs) and the dosimetric consequences during radiotherapy. This review was undertaken to provide an overview of the magnitude and frequency of these effects, and to investigate whether we could find criteria to identify head and neck cancer patients who may benefit from adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Possible relationships between anatomic and dosimetric changes and outcome were explicitly considered.
- Accurate organs at risk definition is essential for radiation treatment of brain tumors. The aim of this study is to provide a stepwise and simplified contouring guide to delineate the OARs in the brain as it would be done in the everyday practice of planning radiotherapy for brain cancer treatment.