Second malignancy probabilities in prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT and other contemporary radiation techniques

      Highlights

      • Risk of second malignancy (SM) with hypofractionated prostate RT or SBRT is unknown.
      • Probabilities of SM after prostate cancer treatments were derived from NCDB.
      • Probability of SM was similar between SBRT and radical prostatectomy.
      • Probability of SM was lower with SBRT compared to other radiation modalities.

      Abstract

      Background

      Prostate radiotherapy has been associated with an increased risk of developing a second malignancy (SM). However, relative SM probabilities following treatment with contemporary radiation techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (HF-IMRT) remain unknown.

      Methods

      A cohort analysis was performed of men from a nationally representative database with localized prostate cancer with at least 60 months of follow-up comparing SM probability amongst men receiving either radical prostatectomy (RP), conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CF-IMRT), HF-IMRT, brachytherapy (BT), or SBRT, using multivariable logistic models, which were used to generate predicted probabilities. Additionally, propensity score-adjusted pairwise assessments of modalities were performed.

      Results

      For 303,432 patients included in the study, median follow-up was 9.08 years (IQR 7.01–11.21). Predicted rates of SM by treatment modality and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for development of SM (referent: RP) were: 6.0% for RP (AOR n/a), 7.1% for CF-IMRT (AOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.14–1.25, P < 0.001), 7.3% for HF-IMRT (AOR 1.25, 95%CI 1.01–1.55, P = 0.045), 6.6% for BT (AOR 1.11, 95%CI 1.07–1.16, P < 0.001), and 5.7% for SBRT (AOR 0.95, 95%CI 0.81–1.12, P = 0.567). On propensity score-adjusted analysis, SBRT was associated with lower odds of SM compared to CF-IMRT (AOR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66–0.93, P = 0.005); no significant difference was found when SBRT was compared to RP (AOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.73–1.03, P = 0.102).

      Conclusions

      Conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy, moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and brachytherapy but not stereotactic body radiotherapy were associated with increased probability of a second malignancy compared to radical prostatectomy. Patients treated with SBRT may be at lower risk of second malignancy due to improved conformality, radiobiological differences or patient selection. The possibility that SBRT in select patients may minimize the probability of SM underscores the need for assessment of second malignancy risk in prospective studies of SBRT.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Radiotherapy and Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kishan A.U.
        • Dang A.
        • Katz A.J.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.8006
        • Brand D.H.
        • Tree A.C.
        • Ostler P.
        • et al.
        Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.
        Lancet Oncol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30569-8
        • Widmark A.
        • Gunnlaugsson A.
        • Beckman L.
        • et al.
        Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
        Lancet. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31131-6
        • Mahase S.S.
        • D’Angelo D.
        • Kang J.
        • Hu J.C.
        • Barbieri C.E.
        • Nagar H.
        Trends in the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy for treatment of prostate cancer in the United States.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20471
        • Murray L.
        • Henry A.
        • Hoskin P.
        • Siebert F.A.
        • Venselaar J.
        Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the clinical data and impact of treatment technique.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.12.012
        • Bhojani N.
        • Capitanio U.
        • Suardi N.
        • et al.
        The rate of secondary malignancies after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a population-based study on 17,845 patients.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.011
        • Moschini M.
        • Zaffuto E.
        • Karakiewicz P.I.
        • et al.
        External beam radiotherapy increases the risk of bladder cancer when compared with radical prostatectomy in patients affected by prostate cancer: a population-based analysis.
        Eur Urol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.034
        • Nieder A.M.
        • Porter M.P.
        • Soloway M.S.
        Radiation therapy for prostate cancer increases subsequent risk of bladder and rectal cancer: a population based cohort study.
        J Urol. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.038
        • Wallis C.J.D.
        • Mahar A.L.
        • Choo R.
        • et al.
        Second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BMJ. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i851
        • Baxter N.N.
        • Tepper J.E.
        • Durham S.B.
        • Rothenberger D.A.
        • Virnig B.A.
        Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation: a population-based study.
        Gastroenterology. 2005; https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.12.038
        • Moon K.
        • Stukenborg G.J.
        • Keim J.
        • Theodorescu D.
        Cancer incidence after localized therapy for prostate cancer.
        Cancer. 2006; https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22083
        • Jao S.W.
        • Beart R.W.
        • Reiman H.M.
        • Gunderson L.L.
        • Ilstrup D.M.
        Colon and anorectal cancer after pelvic irradiation.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1987; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554284
        • D’Amico A.V.
        • Whittington R.
        • Bruce Malkowicz S.
        • et al.
        Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1998; 280: 969-974https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.11.969
        • Mohler J.L.
        • Antonarakis E.S.
        • Armstrong A.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.
        J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019; https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023
      1. Dee EC, Arega MA, Yang DD, et al. Disparities in refusal of locoregional treatment for prostate adenocarcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract. Published online 2021.

        • Dee E.C.
        • Muralidhar V.
        • Arega M.A.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing non-completion of radiotherapy among men with localized prostate cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.064
        • Xiang M.
        • Chang D.T.
        • Pollom E.L.
        Second cancer risk after primary cancer treatment with three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiation therapy.
        Cancer. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32938
        • Boffa D.J.
        • Rosen J.E.
        • Mallin K.
        • et al.
        Using the national cancer database for outcomes research a review.
        JAMA Oncol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6905
        • Lalani N.
        • Jimenez R.B.
        • Yeap B.
        Understanding propensity score analyses.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.638
        • Movsas B.
        • Hanlon A.L.
        • Pinover W.
        • Hanks G.E.
        Is there an increased risk of second primaries following prostate irradiation?.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00570-1
        • Kleinerman R.A.
        • Boice J.D.
        • Storm H.H.
        • et al.
        Second primary cancer after treatment for cervical cancer. An international cancer registries study.
        Cancer. 1995; https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950801)76:3<442::AID-CNCR2820760315>3.0.CO;2-L
        • Timmerman R.D.
        • Herman J.
        • Cho L.C.
        Emergence of stereotactic body radiation therapy and its impact on current and future clinical practice.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.4675
        • Stokes W.A.
        • Kavanagh B.D.
        • Raben D.
        • Pugh T.J.
        Implementation of hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy in the United States: A National Cancer Database analysis.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2017.03.011
        • Murray L.J.
        • Thompson C.M.
        • Lilley J.
        • et al.
        Radiation-induced second primary cancer risks from modern external beam radiotherapy for early prostate cancer: Impact of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and flattening filter free (FFF) radiotherapy.
        Phys Med Biol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1237
        • Schneider U.
        • Besserer J.
        • MacK A.
        Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential for second cancer reduction.
        Theor Biol Med Model. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-7-4
        • Kim D.W.
        • Chung W.K.
        • Yoon M.
        Imaging doses and secondary cancer risk from kilovoltage cone-beam ct in radiation therapy.
        Health Phys. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e318285c685
        • Zelefsky M.J.
        • Pei X.
        • Teslova T.
        • et al.
        Secondary cancers after intensity-modulated radiotherapy, brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer: Incidence and cause-specific survival outcomes according to the initial treatment intervention.
        BJU Int. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11385.x