Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 154, P29-35, January 2021

Download started.

Ok

Single-fraction HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Outcomes from two clinical trials with and without an MRI-guided boost

Published:September 09, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.007

      Highlights

      • Single fraction high dose-rate brachytherapy has high local recurrence rate.
      • Dose escalation with an MR-guided boost to the dominant lesion does not improve outcome.
      • Single fraction protocols should not be used.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Single-fraction HDR monotherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer is appealing, but published outcomes are discouraging. An approach to improve local control is MRI-guided focal dose-escalation to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). Here we report a comparison of outcomes from two phase II clinical trials with and without a focal boost.

      Methods

      Patients had low or intermediate-risk disease. Patients in Trial1 received a single 19 Gy HDR implant to the whole prostate. Trial2 incorporated an additional MRI-guided focal DIL boost to at least 23 Gy. ADT was not allowed. Toxicities (CTCAEv4.0) and quality of life (EPIC) were collected. Biochemical failure (BF) was defined as nadir +2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to search for predictors of BF.

      Results

      Trial1 had 87 patients with a median follow-up of 62 months, while Trial2 had 60 patients with a median follow-up of 50 months. The five-year cumulative BF rate was 32.6% and 31.3%, respectively (p = 0.9). 77.5% of failures were biopsy-confirmed local failures, all of which underwent local salvage therapy. The addition of a DIL boost was not associated with worse toxicity or QOL. Baseline PSA and Gleason score correlated with BF, but none of the dosimetric parameters was a significant predictor of BF.

      Conclusions

      MRI-guided focal boost was safe and well tolerated, but did not improve local control after 19 Gy single-fraction HDR monotherapy, and the control rates were unacceptable. Single-fraction HDR monotherapy for prostate cancer should not be offered outside of clinical trials.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Radiotherapy and Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mendez L.C.
        • Morton G.C.
        High dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 7: 357-370
        • Demanes D.J.
        • Ghilezan M.I.
        High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer.
        Brachytherapy. 2014; 13: 529-541https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2014.03.002
        • Krauss D.J.
        • Ye H.
        • Martinez A.A.
        • Mitchell B.
        • Sebastian E.
        • Limbacher A.
        • et al.
        Favorable preliminary outcomes for men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with 19-Gy single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 2017; 97: 98-106https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.011
        • Hoskin P.
        • Rojas A.
        • Ostler P.
        • Hughes R.
        • Alonzi R.
        • Lowe G.
        Single-dose high-dose-rate brachytherapy compared to two and three fractions for locally advanced prostate cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2017; 124: 56-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.014
        • Prada P.J.
        • Cardenal J.
        • Blanco A.G.
        • Anchuelo J.
        • Ferri M.
        • Fernández G.
        • et al.
        High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in one fraction for the treatment of favorable stage prostate cancer: toxicity and long-term biochemical results.
        Radiother Oncol. 2016; 119: 411-416https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.006
        • Prada P.J.
        • Ferri M.
        • Cardenal J.
        • Blanco A.G.
        • Anchuelo J.
        • Díaz de Cerio I.
        • et al.
        High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy in one fraction of 20.5 Gy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: toxicity and 6-year biochemical results.
        Brachytherapy. 2018; 17: 845-851https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2018.06.002
        • Xu M.J.
        • Chen K.S.
        • Chang A.J.
        • Lazar A.
        • Shinohara K.
        • Cunha J.A.M.
        • et al.
        Single-fraction brachytherapy as monotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer: the UCSF experience.
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18: 470-476https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.03.002
        • Siddiqui Z.A.
        • Gustafson G.S.
        • Ye H.
        • Martinez A.A.
        • Mitchell B.
        • Sebastian E.
        • et al.
        Five-year outcomes of a single-institution prospective trial of 19-Gy single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 2019; 104: 1038-1044https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.010
        • Morton G.
        • McGuffin M.
        • Chung H.T.
        • Tseng C.-L.
        • Helou J.
        • Ravi A.
        • et al.
        Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy.
        Radiother Oncol. 2020; 146: 90-96https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.009
        • Morton G.C.
        • Hoskin P.J.
        Single fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy: too good to be true?.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 2019; 104: 1054-1056https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.04.036
        • Alayed Y.
        • D’Alimonte L.
        • Helou J.
        • Ravi A.
        • Morton G.
        • Chung H.T.
        • et al.
        MRI assisted focal boost integrated with HDR monotherapy study in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (MARS): Results from a phase II clinical trial.
        Radiother Oncol. 2019; 141: 144-148https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.011
        • Morton G.C.
        Prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy: transrectal ultrasound based planning, a technical note.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015; 5: 238-240https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2014.12.009
      1. Shaaer A, Paudel M, Davidson M, Semple M, Nicolae A, Mendez LC, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of MRI-to-ultrasound automated image registration algorithms for prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2020:S153847212030132X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2020.06.014.

        • Shaaer A.
        • Davidson M.
        • Semple M.
        • Nicolae A.
        • Mendez L.C.
        • Chung H.
        • et al.
        Clinical evaluation of an MRI-to-ultrasound deformable image registration algorithm for prostate brachytherapy.
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18: 95-102https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2018.08.006
        • Trotti A.
        • Colevas A.D.
        • Setser A.
        • Rusch V.
        • Jaques D.
        • Budach V.
        • et al.
        CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment.
        Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003; 13: 176-181https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00031-6
        • Wei J.T.
        • Dunn R.L.
        • Litwin M.S.
        • Sandler H.M.
        • Sanda M.G.
        Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.
        Urology. 2000; 56: 899-905https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X
        • Roach M.
        • Hanks G.
        • Thames H.
        • Schellhammer P.
        • Shipley W.U.
        • Sokol G.H.
        • et al.
        Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.
        Int J Radiat Oncol. 2006; 65: 965-974https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029
        • Helou J.
        • Morton G.
        • Zhang L.
        • Deabreu A.
        • D’Alimonte L.
        • Elias E.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer treated at a single institution: stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or external beam+high dose rate brachytherapy boost.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; 113: 404-409https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.10.013
      2. Gay H. Safety and Efficacy of 23 Gy for High Dose Rate (HDR) Prostate Brachytherapy (NCT03424850) n.d. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03424850.

        • Supiot S.
        • Rousseau C.
        • Dore M.
        • Chèze-Le-Rest C.
        • Kandel-Aznar C.
        • Potiron V.
        • et al.
        Reoxygenation during radiotherapy in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
        Radiother Oncol. 2019; 133: 16-19https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.022
        • Tien C.J.
        • Carlson D.J.
        • Nath R.
        • Chen Z. (Jay)
        High-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for prostate cancer: the impact of cellular repair and source decay.
        Brachytherapy. 2019; 18: 701-710https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.005