Advertisement

Patterns of proton therapy use in pediatric cancer management in 2016: An international survey

Published:November 07, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.022

      Highlights

      • In 2016, 1860 pediatric patients were treated with protons in 40 centers.
      • The median number of pediatric patients per center is 29, but it widely varies.
      • CNS tumors were the cancer types most commonly treated in all continents.
      • The proportion of extra-cranial tumors is growing worldwide.
      • About half of the patients were treated with pencil beam scanning.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To facilitate the initiation of observational studies on late effects of proton therapy in pediatric patients, we report on current patterns of proton therapy use worldwide in patients aged less than 22 years.

      Materials & methods

      Fifty-four proton centers treating pediatric patients in 2016 in 11 countries were invited to respond to a survey about the number of patients treated during that year by age group, intent of treatment, delivery technique and tumor types.

      Results

      Among the 40 participating centers (participation rate: 74%), a total of 1,860 patients were treated in 2016 (North America: 1205, Europe: 432, Asia: 223). The numbers of patients per center ranged from 1 to 206 (median: 29). Twenty-four percent of the patients were <5 years of age, and 50% <10 years. More than 30 pediatric tumor types were identified, mainly treated with curative intent: 48% were CNS, 25% extra-cranial sarcomas, 7% neuroblastoma, and 5% hematopoietic tumors. About half of the patients were treated with pencil beam scanning. Treatment patterns were broadly similar across the three continents.

      Conclusion

      To our knowledge, this survey provides the first worldwide assessment of proton therapy use for pediatric cancer management. Since previous estimates in the United States and Europe, CNS tumors remain the cancer types most commonly treated with protons in 2016. However, the proportion of extra-cranial tumors is growing worldwide. The typically low numbers of patients treated in each center indicate the need for international research collaborations to assess long-term outcomes of proton therapy in pediatric patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Radiotherapy and Oncology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Glimelius B.
        • Ask A.
        • Bjelkengren G.
        • Bjork-Eriksson T.
        • Blomquist E.
        • Johansson B.
        • et al.
        Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy.
        Acta Oncol. 2005; 44: 836-849
      1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Tobacco smoking In: Personal habits and indoor combustions. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol. 100E. IARC: Lyon, France; 2012;1:43–212.

        • Allard A.
        • Haddy N.
        • Le Deley M.C.
        • Rubino C.
        • Lassalle M.
        • Samsaldin A.
        • et al.
        Role of radiation dose in the risk of secondary leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood treated between 1980 and 1999.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78: 1474-1482
        • Allodji R.S.
        • Schwartz B.
        • Veres C.
        • Haddy N.
        • Rubino C.
        • Le Deley M.C.
        • et al.
        Risk of subsequent leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood: impact of bone marrow radiation therapy and chemotherapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 93: 658-667
        • Patel S.
        • Kostaras X.
        • Parliament M.
        • Olivotto I.A.
        • Nordal R.
        • Aronyk K.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for the referral of patients for proton-beam therapy, an Alberta Health Services report: a model for Canada?.
        Curr Oncol. 2014; 21: 251-262
        • Meattini I.
        • Livi L.
        • Saieva C.
        • Marrazzo L.
        • Rampini A.
        • Iermano C.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer following Hodgkin's Disease: the experience of the University of Florence.
        Breast J. 2010; 16: 290-296
        • Ladra M.M.
        • Edgington S.K.
        • Mahajan A.
        • Grosshans D.
        • Szymonifka J.
        • Khan F.
        • et al.
        A dosimetric comparison of proton and intensity modulated radiation therapy in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma patients enrolled on a prospective phase II proton study.
        Radiother Oncol. 2014; 113: 77-83
        • Indelicato D.J.
        • Merchant T.
        • Laperriere N.
        • Lassen Y.
        • Vennarini S.
        • Wolden S.
        • et al.
        Consensus report from the stockholm pediatric proton therapy conference.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 96: 387-392
        • Weber D.C.
        • Habrand J.L.
        • Hoppe B.S.
        • Hill Kayser C.
        • Laack N.N.
        • Langendijk J.A.
        • et al.
        Proton therapy for pediatric malignancies: Fact, figures and costs. A joint consensus statement from the pediatric subcommittee of PTCOG, PROS and EPTN.
        Radiother Oncol. 2018;
        • Ladra M.M.
        • Szymonifka J.D.
        • Mahajan A.
        • Friedmann A.M.
        • Yong Yeap B.
        • Goebel C.P.
        • et al.
        Preliminary results of a phase II trial of proton radiotherapy for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 3762-3770
        • Yock T.I.
        • Yeap B.Y.
        • Ebb D.H.
        • Weyman E.
        • Eaton B.R.
        • Sherry N.A.
        • et al.
        Long-term toxic effects of proton radiotherapy for paediatric medulloblastoma: a phase 2 single-arm study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17: 287-298
        • Leroy R.
        • Benahmed N.
        • Hulstaert F.
        • Van Damme N.
        • De Ruysscher D.
        Proton therapy in children: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness in 15 pediatric cancers.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95: 267-278
        • Chung C.S.
        • Yock T.I.
        • Nelson K.
        • Xu Y.
        • Keating N.L.
        • Tarbell N.J.
        Incidence of second malignancies among patients treated with proton versus photon radiation.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87: 46-52
        • Sethi R.V.
        • Shih H.A.
        • Yeap B.Y.
        • Mouw K.W.
        • Petersen R.
        • Kim D.Y.
        • et al.
        Second nonocular tumors among survivors of retinoblastoma treated with contemporary photon and proton radiotherapy.
        Cancer. 2014; 120: 126-133
        • Pulsifer M.B.
        • Sethi R.V.
        • Kuhlthau K.A.
        • MacDonald S.M.
        • Tarbell N.J.
        • Yock T.I.
        Early cognitive outcomes following proton radiation in pediatric patients with brain and central nervous system tumors.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 93: 400-407
        • Mizumoto M.
        • Murayama S.
        • Akimoto T.
        • Demizu Y.
        • Fukushima T.
        • Ishida Y.
        • et al.
        Proton beam therapy for pediatric malignancies: a retrospective observational multicenter study in Japan.
        Cancer Med. 2016; 5: 1519-1525
        • Chung C.T.
        • Bogart J.A.
        • Adams J.F.
        • Sagerman R.H.
        • Numann P.J.
        • Tassiopoulos A.
        • et al.
        Increased risk of breast cancer in splenectomized patients undergoing radiation therapy for Hodgkin's disease.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 37: 405-409
        • Hess C.B.
        • Indelicato D.J.
        • Paulino A.C.
        • Hartsell W.F.
        • Hill-Kayser C.E.
        • Perkins S.M.
        • et al.
        An update from the pediatric proton consortium registry.
        Front Oncol. 2018; 8: 165
        • Berrington de Gonzalez A.
        • Vikram B.
        • Buchsbaum J.C.
        • de Vathaire F.
        • Dorr W.
        • Hass-Kogan D.
        • et al.
        A Clarion call for large-scale collaborative studies of pediatric proton therapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 98: 980-981
        • Chang A.L.
        • Yock T.I.
        • Mahajan A.
        • Hill-Kaiser C.
        • Keole S.
        • Loredo L.
        • et al.
        Pediatric proton therapy: patterns of care across the United States.
        Int J Particle Ther. 2014; 1: 357-367
        • Carrie C.
        • Mahe M.A.
        Organization of the pediatric radiation oncology in France.
        Cancer Radiother. 2009; 13: 525-526
        • Sakurai H.
        • Ishikawa H.
        • Okumura T.
        Proton beam therapy in Japan: current and future status.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016; 46: 885-892
      2. Alapetite C, Timmermann B, Weber DC, Harrabi S, Ondrova B, Nilsson K, et al. Proton beam therapy for children: current practice in Europe. In: Ther IJP, editor. 55th annual meeting of the particle therapy cooperative group (PTCOG). Prague, Czech Republic; 2016. p. 75.

        • Knops R.R.
        • van Dalen E.C.
        • Mulder R.L.
        • Leclercq E.
        • Knijnenburg S.L.
        • Kaspers G.J.
        • et al.
        The volume effect in paediatric oncology: a systematic review.
        Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 1749-1753
        • Kann B.H.
        • Park H.S.
        • Lester-Coll N.H.
        • Yeboa D.N.
        • Benitez V.
        • Khan A.J.
        • et al.
        Postoperative radiotherapy patterns of care and survival implications for medulloblastoma in young children.
        JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 1574-1581
        • Geng C.
        • Moteabbed M.
        • Xie Y.
        • Schuemann J.
        • Yock T.
        • Paganetti H.
        Assessing the radiation-induced second cancer risk in proton therapy for pediatric brain tumors: the impact of employing a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning.
        Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61: 12-22
        • Paganetti H.
        Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.
        Phys Med Biol. 2014; 59: R419-R472
        • Mohan R.
        • Held K.D.
        • Story M.D.
        • Grosshans D.
        • Capala J.
        Proceedings of the National Cancer Institute Workshop on charged particle radiobiology.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018; 100: 816-831
        • Bonfrate A.
        • Farah J.
        • De Marzi L.
        • Delacroix S.
        • Herault J.
        • Sayah R.
        • et al.
        Influence of beam incidence and irradiation parameters on stray neutron doses to healthy organs of pediatric patients treated for an intracranial tumor with passive scattering proton therapy.
        Phys Med. 2016; 32: 590-599
        • Halg R.A.
        • Besserer J.
        • Boschung M.
        • Mayer S.
        • Lomax A.J.
        • Schneider U.
        Measurements of the neutron dose equivalent for various radiation qualities, treatment machines and delivery techniques in radiation therapy.
        Phys Med Biol. 2014; 59: 2457-2468