Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 103, Issue 2 , Pages 178-182, May 2012

Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines

  • Liesbeth J. Boersma

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Dr. Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands.
    • Both authors contributed equally.
  • ,
  • Tomas Janssen

      Affiliations

    • The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    • Both authors contributed equally.
  • ,
  • Paula H.M. Elkhuizen

      Affiliations

    • The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Philip Poortmans

      Affiliations

    • Institute Verbeeten, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Maurice van der Sangen

      Affiliations

    • Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Astrid N. Scholten

      Affiliations

    • Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Bianca Hanbeukers

      Affiliations

    • Maastricht University Medical Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Joop C. Duppen

      Affiliations

    • The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Coen Hurkmans

      Affiliations

    • Catharina Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Corine van Vliet

      Affiliations

    • The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 5 August 2011; received in revised form 9 December 2011; accepted 19 December 2011. published online 24 January 2012.

Abstract 

Aims

To investigate whether using a pre-operative CT scan (Preop-CT) (1) decreases interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving therapy (BCT), and (2) influences the size of the delineated volumes.

Patients and methods

Thirty cT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients underwent a CT-scan in radiation treatment position, prior to and after lumpectomy. Five observers delineated a boost-CTV, both with and without access to the Preop-CT. For each patient and for each observer pair, the conformity index (CI) and the distance between the centres of mass (COMd) for both boost volumes were calculated. In addition, all delineated volumes including the standard deviation (SD) with respect to the median delineation were calculated.

Results

Using a Preop-CT reduced the mean COMd of the boost-CTV from 1.1cm to 1.0cm (p<0.001). No effect was seen on the CI, but the boost-CTV volume reduced from 42cc to 36cc (p=0.005), implying a reduction of interobserver variation. We saw no significant change in the SD.

Conclusion

Use of a Preop-CT in BCT results in a modest but statistically significant reduction in interobserver variation of the boost-CTV delineations and in a significant reduction in the boost-CTV volume.

Keywords: Breast conserving therapy, Tumourbed delineation, Pre-operative CT, Interobserver variation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented at the 11th Biennial ESTRO meeting London.

PII: S0167-8140(11)00761-4

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.021

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 103, Issue 2 , Pages 178-182, May 2012