Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 3 , Pages 393-398, March 2012

A practical method of identifying data loss in 4DCT

  • David W. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, St. James’s Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
  • ,
  • Christopher Dean

      Affiliations

    • Radiotherapy Physics, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
  • ,
  • John Lilley

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK

Received 16 August 2011; received in revised form 22 September 2011; accepted 11 October 2011. published online 21 November 2011.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

The design, testing and clinical implementation of a simple quality assurance tool which allows quick and accurate identification of regions of data loss and data interpolation in 4DCT data sets is reported.

Materials and methods

A 4DCT model, dependent on gantry rotation time and pitch, was developed to allow an understanding of the data collection and reconstruction processes. To test this model, 4DCT scans of a phantom were acquired using a Siemens SOMATOM Sensation 40 slice CT scanner. A radio-opaque rod mounted under the couch top was present during the phantom scans.

Results

The model predicts that periodic regions of data loss occur when the respiration rate drops below a critical value. These results are verified by experimental data. Regions of data loss result in breaks in the imaged radio-opaque rod.

Conclusions

Regions of data loss in 4DCT data sets can be difficult to detect. Mounting a radio-opaque rod under the couch top allows regions of data loss and data interpolation to be quickly assessed on a patient by patient basis. This quality assurance tool has been successfully implemented into clinical use. The results of this work have implications for quality assurance programmes for 4DCT scanning.

Keywords: Lung cancer, 4DCT, Respiratory motion, Quality assurance, Radiotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(11)00599-8

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.10.002

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 3 , Pages 393-398, March 2012