« BackRadiotherapy & Oncology
Article in Press

Second cancer after radiotherapy, 1981–2007

  • Detlef Bartkowiak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, D 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • ,
  • Nicole Humble

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Peter Suhr

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Juliane Hagg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Katharina Mair

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Bernd Polivka

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Uwe Schneider

      Affiliations

    • Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich/Radiotherapy Hirslanden AG, Aarau, Switzerland
  • ,
  • Dirk Bottke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Wiegel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany

Received 12 April 2011; received in revised form 1 September 2011; accepted 6 September 2011. published online 12 October 2011.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

Background and purpose

Today, there is growing concern about radiotherapy induced secondary malignancies. We analysed the incidence and dose dependence of second cancer.

Material and methods

The study includes 12,000 one-year survivors of radiotherapy, treated between 1981 and 2007. For risk estimates a public databank on cancer in Germany served as reference. Contralateral second breast cancer, second oesophageal and colorectal cancer were analysed with retrospective dosimetry. GI-tract data were used for risk modelling.

Results

The incidence rate of second cancers (493 cases) was ∼1% per year. Contralateral breast cancer was the most frequent entity (relative risk RR=2.8). The scatter-dose gradient (2–3Gy) across the contralateral breast did not cause a detectable risk gradient. There was an increased risk for second head and neck cancer (RR=5.1) and for male oesophageal cancer (RR=5.8). For both entities, dose response modelling with case-control data predicted maximum curves with peak induction at 1–5Gy and positive excess absolute risk values at high doses.

Conclusions

A survey of second cancer after radiotherapy requires follow-up over decades. Preliminary dose response modelling albeit with low case numbers suggests an increased risk from multiportal techniques. To improve risk assessment, prospective out-of-field dosimetry and long-term multicentre data collection are recommended.

Keywords: Radiotherapy, Peripheral dose, Radiation risk, Follow-up study, Cancer epidemiology, Risk models

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(11)00539-1

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.013

« BackRadiotherapy & Oncology