Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 1 , Pages 14-21, January 2012

Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands

  • Jasper Nijkamp

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Danielle F.M. de Haas-Kock

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastro Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Jannet C. Beukema

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Karen J. Neelis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Dankert Woutersen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Heleen Ceha

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Tom Rozema

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Bernard Verbeeten Instutute, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Annerie Slot

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Hanneke Vos-Westerman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Martijn Intven

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Patty H. Spruit

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Yvette van der Linden

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapeutic Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Debby Geijsen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Karijn Verschueren

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Marcel B. van Herk

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Corrie A.M. Marijnen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Received 1 April 2011; received in revised form 1 August 2011; accepted 10 August 2011. published online 07 September 2011.

Abstract 

Purpose

The aim of this study was to measure and improve the quality of target volume delineation by means of national consensus on target volume definition in early-stage rectal cancer.

Methods and materials

The CTV’s for eight patients were delineated by 11 radiation oncologists in 10 institutes according to local guidelines (phase 1). After observer variation analysis a workshop was organized to establish delineation guidelines and a digital atlas, with which the same observers re-delineated the dataset (phase 2). Variation in volume, most caudal and cranial slice and local surface distance variation were analyzed.

Results

The average delineated CTV volume decreased from 620 to 460cc (p<0.001) in phase 2. Variation in the caudal CTV border was reduced significantly from 1.8 to 1.2cm SD (p=0.01), while it remained 0.7cm SD for the cranial border. The local surface distance variation (cm SD) reduced from 1.02 to 0.74 for anterior, 0.63 to 0.54 for lateral, 0.33 to 0.25 for posterior and 1.22 to 0.46 for the sphincter region, respectively.

Conclusions

The large variation in target volume delineation could significantly be reduced by use of consensus guidelines and a digital delineation atlas. Despite the significant reduction there is still a need for further improvement.

Keywords: Delineation variation, Rectal cancer, Delineation atlas, Clinical target volume

 

PII: S0167-8140(11)00478-6

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.011

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 1 , Pages 14-21, January 2012