Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 1 , Pages 10-13, January 2012

Preoperative treatment with capecitabine, bevacizumab and radiotherapy for primary locally advanced rectal cancer – A two stage phase II clinical trial

  • Gudrun Resch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Grieskirchnerstraße 42, A-4600 Wels, Austria.
  • ,
  • Alexander De Vries

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Feldkirch Hospital, Austria
  • ,
  • Dietmar Öfner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Private Medical University Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Eisterer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine I, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria
  • ,
  • Hans Rabl

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Leoben-Eisenerz Hospital, Austria
  • ,
  • Michael Jagoditsch

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, St. Veit Hospital, Austria
  • ,
  • Michael Gnant

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Josef Thaler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Austria
  • ,
  • on behalf of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

Received 20 October 2010; received in revised form 18 May 2011; accepted 5 June 2011. published online 11 July 2011.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

The aim of this single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial was to assess the feasibility and tolerability of preoperative radiotherapy and simultaneous capecitabine and bevacizumab. Secondary endpoints were downstaging-rate and induction of complete pathological response.

Material and methods

Patients with cT3 rectal cancer were eligible. Capecitabine (825mg/sqm twice daily on radiotherapy-days weeks 1–4) and bevacizumab (5mg/kg on days 1, 15 and 29) were administered concurrently to pelvic radiotherapy (1.8Gy daily up to 45Gy in 5weeks). Surgery followed 6–8weeks later. A two-stage trial was designed with early termination at eight patients if more than three patients had experienced a common toxicity criteria ⩾grade 3 according to the NCI CTC guidelines.

Results

In the first stage eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 70years (range 55–76) and ECOG PS 0/1 (%) was 87.5/12.5. Major side effects were mostly intestinal bleeding (grade 3, 25%), diarrhea (grade 3, 25%), perianal and abdominal pain (grades 3 and 4, 25%) followed by anemia (grade 3, 12.5%). Tumor downstaging was observed in 37.5% of patients with complete pathological response in two patients (25%).

Conclusions

After interim analysis of feasibility and tolerability, accrual was terminated according to protocol due to ⩾grade 3 toxicities in 50% of patients. Complete pathological response was seen in 25% of patients but was accompanied by considerable toxicity. Further clinical trials are needed to clarify the role of bevacizumab in this setting.

Keywords: Rectal cancer, Chemoradiation, Capecitabine, Bevacizumab

 

 Previous presentation: Abstract published at ASCO GI 2010, # 496.

PII: S0167-8140(11)00319-7

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.008

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 102, Issue 1 , Pages 10-13, January 2012