Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 3 , Pages 298-301 , September 2010

Patient setup for PET/CT acquisition in radiotherapy planning

  • Mary Coffey

      Affiliations

    • TCD School of Radiation Therapy, Trinity Centre for Health Science, Dublin, Ireland
  • ,
  • Aude Vaandering

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Received 5 June 2010 ,Revised 17 July 2010 ,Accepted 29 July 2010.

References 

  1. Trott KR. Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy?. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:1–3
  2. Tubiana M. Can we reduce the incidence of second primary malignancies occurring after radiotherapy? A critical review. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:4–15[discussion 11–13]
  3. Budiharto T, Musat E, Poortmans P, et al. Profile of European radiotherapy departments contributing to the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) in the 21st century. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:403–410
  4. MacManus M, Nestle U, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006–2007. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:85–94
  5. Olsen DR, Thwaites DI. Now you see it… Imaging in radiotherapy treatment planning and delivery. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:173–175
  6. Gregoire V. Is there any future in radiotherapy planning without the use of PET: unraveling the myth. Radiother Oncol. 2004;73:261–263
  7. Ford EC, Herman J, Yorke E, Wahl RL. 18F-FDG PET/CT for image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1655–1665
  8. In:  Parker W,  Patrocinio H,  Podgorsak EB editor. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005;
  9. Zaidi H, Vees H, Wissmeyer M. Molecular PET/CT imaging-guided radiation therapy treatment planning. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:1108–1133
  10. Griffiths SE, Craig A, Abraham M. Radiographer roles and risk management in radiotherapy, and a UK survey. J Radiother Pract. 2006;5:137–146
  11. Mutic S. The simulation process in the determination and definition of the treatment volume and treatment planning, in technical basis of radiation therapy: practical clinical applications. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2006;
  12. Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. Med Phys. 2003;30:2762–2792
  13. Levitt SH, Purdy JA, Perez CA, Vijayakumar S. Technical basis of radiation therapy: practical clinical application. 4th ed.. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2008;
  14. Otero HJ, Yap JT, Patak MA, et al. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:326–332
  15. Paulino AC. PT–CT in radiotherapy treatment planning. USA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008;
  16. Kearns WT, Urbanic JJ, Hampton CJ, et al. Radiation safety issues with positron-emission/computed tomography simulation for stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9:2763
  17. Bentel GC, Marks LB, Hendren K, Brizel DM. Comparison of two head and neck immobilization systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:867–873
  18. Bentel GC, Marks LB, Sherouse GW, Spencer DP. A customized head and neck support system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:245–248
  19. Saw CB, Yakoob R, Enke CA, Lau TP, Ayyangar KM. Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Med Dosim. 2001;26:71–77
  20. Verhey LJ. Immobilizing and positioning patients for radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1995;5:100–114
  21. McNair HA, Brock J, Symonds-Tayler JRN, et al. Feasibility of the use of the Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC) in patients receiving radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:424–429
  22. Guckenberger M, Krieger T, Richter A, et al. Potential of image-guidance, gating and real-time tracking to improve accuracy in pulmonary stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:288–295
  23. Han K, Cheung P, Basran PS, et al. A comparison of two immobilization systems for stereotactic body radiation therapy of lung tumors. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:103–108
  24. Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, Mijnheer BJ. Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol. 2001;58:105–120
  25. MacManus M, Leong T. Review: incorporating PET information into radiation therapy planning. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;3:e4
  26. Haworth A, Kearvell R, Greer PB, et al. Assuring high quality treatment delivery in clinical trials – results from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) study 03.04 “RADAR” set-up accuracy study. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:299–306
  27. O’Neill L, Armstrong J, Buckney S, et al. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:61–66
  28. Smeenk RJ, Teh BS, Butler EB, van Lin EN, Kaanders JH. Is there a role for endorectal balloons in prostate radiotherapy? A systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:277–282

PII: S0167-8140(10)00447-0

doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.020

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 3 , Pages 298-301 , September 2010