Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 97, Issue 3 , Pages 462-466, December 2010

Which α/β ratio and half-time of repair are useful for predicting outcomes in prostate cancer?

  • Philippe Nickers

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium
    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3, Rue Frederic Combemale, 59000 Lille, France.
  • ,
  • Johanne Hermesse

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium
  • ,
  • Jean-Marie Deneufbourg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium
    • Honorary.
  • ,
  • Sophie Vanbelle

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Statistics, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium
  • ,
  • Eric Lartigau

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Received 12 November 2009; received in revised form 21 June 2010; accepted 22 June 2010. published online 19 August 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To calculate the α/β of prostate adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

From January 1997 to December 2005, 328 patients were treated consecutively with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost. The patients with at least one of the following adverse prognostic factors were included: PSA>10ng/ml, Gleason score7, T2B. A total EQD2 of 80Gy was delivered uniformly within the same timeframe. Prior to August 2002, the patients were treated to low-dose-rate brachytherapy using 192Ir (n=201), and those treated thereafter received a high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (n=127). The equivalency of dose was established using the incomplete repair model, with generally accepted α/β ratio of 3Gy, and half-time for repair of sublethal damage (HTR) of 1.5h.

Results

In a Cox proportional hazards model, the two groups displayed no difference (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87–1.1, p=0.98) in biochemical control. Analyzing using the linear quadratic model, the data fit well an α/β ratio of 3.41Gy (95% CI: 2.56–4.26) and the recently published HTR of 1.9h (95% CI: 1.4–2.4), but also an α/β of 5.87Gy (95% CI: 4.67–7.07) and the more widely established HTR of 1.5h.

Conclusions

Unlike the previously published data, calculation of the α/β ratio from consecutive patients and using a uniform treatment duration points to higher values than 2.5Gy.

Keywords: Prostate cancer, Radiotherapy, Radiobiology, α/β ratio, Androgen deprivation therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(10)00390-7

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.06.006

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 97, Issue 3 , Pages 462-466, December 2010