Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 3 , Pages 302-307 , September 2010

Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: Some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology

  • John A. Lee

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress: Centre for molecular imaging and experimental radiotherapy (IMRE 5469), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 55/5469, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Received 9 June 2010 ,Revised 7 July 2010 ,Accepted 7 July 2010.

References 

  1. Valk PE, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN. Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. Springer; 2004;
  2. Wahl RL, Buchanan JW. Principles and practice of positron emission tomography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002;
  3. Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of september 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:78S–88S
  4. Schrevens L, Lorent N, Dooms C, Vansteenkiste J. The role of PET scan in diagnosis, staging, and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9:633–643
  5. Bassi MC, Turri L, Sacchetti G, et al. FDG-PET/CT imaging for staging and target volume delineation in preoperative conformal radiotherapy of rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1423–1426
  6. Grégoire V, Haustermans K, Geets X, Roels S, Lonneux M. PET-based treatment planning in radiotherapy: a new standard?. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:68S–77S
  7. Ford EC, Herman J, Yorke E, Wahl RL. 18F-FDG PET/CT for image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1655
  8. MacManus M, Nestle U, Rosenzweig KE, et al. Use of PET and PET/CT for radiation therapy planning: IAEA expert report 2006–2007. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:85–94
  9. Öllers M, Bosmans G, van Baardwijk A, et al. The integration of PET–CT scans from different hospitals into radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:142–146
  10. Geets X, Tomsej M, Lee JA, et al. Adaptive biological image-guided IMRT with anatomic and functional imaging in pharyngolaryngeal tumors: impact on target volume delineation and dose distribution using helical tomotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2007;85:105–115
  11. Feng M, Kong F, Gross M, Fernando S, Hayman JA, Ten Haken RK. Using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to assess tumor volume during radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer and its potential impact on adaptive dose escalation and normal tissue sparing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:1228–1234
  12. Roels S, Slagmolen P, Nuyts J, et al. Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: challenges and pitfalls. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:782–790
  13. Langenhoff BS, Oyen WJG, Jager GJ, et al. Efficacy of fluorine-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in detecting tumor recurrence after local ablative therapy for liver metastases: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4453–4458
  14. Kinahan P, Schmitz R, Alessio A. The physics of PET/CT scanners. In:  Lin E,  Alavi A editor. PET and PET/CT: a clinical guide. Thieme; 2006;p. 3–14
  15. Nestle U, Kremp S, Schaefer-Schuler A, et al. Comparison of different methods for the delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1342–1348
  16. Drever L, Roa W, McEwan A, Robinson D. Comparison of three image segmentation techniques for target volume delineation in positron emission tomography. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007;8:93–109
  17. Schinagl DA, Vogel WV, Hoffmann AL, van Dalen JA, Oyen WJ, Kaanders JH. Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1282–1289
  18. Vees H, Senthamizhchelvan S, Miralbell R, Weber DC, Ratib O, Zaidi H. Assessment of various strategies for 18F-FET PET-guided delineation of target volumes in high-grade glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 2009;36:182–193
  19. Yaremko B, Riauka T, Robinson D, et al. Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:5969–5982
  20. Riegel AC, Berson AM, Destian S, et al. Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:726–732
  21. Guido A, Fuccio L, Rombi B, et al. Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in radiotherapy target delineation for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:759–763
  22. Paulino AC, Koshy M, Howell R, Schuster D, Davis LW. Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;61:1385–1392
  23. Daisne J-F, Duprez T, Weynand B, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG-PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology. 2004;233:93–100
  24. Pham DL, Xu C, Prince JL. Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315–337
  25. McLachlan GJ, Peel D. Finite mixture models. Wiley; 2000;
  26. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol). 1977;39:1–38
  27. Jain AK, Murty MN, Flynn PJ. Data clustering: a review. ACM Comput Surv. 1999;31:264–323
  28. Janssen M, Aerts H, Ollers M, et al. Tumor delineation based on time activity curve differences assessed with dynamic fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography in rectal cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;73:456–465
  29. El Naqa I, Yang D, Apte A, et al. Concurrent multimodality image segmentation by active contours for radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 2007;34:4738–4749
  30. Noordam JC, Van Den Broek WHAM. Multivariate image segmentation based on geometrically guided fuzzy c-means clustering. J Chemometrics. 2002;16:1–11
  31. Cai W, Chen S, Zhang D. Fast and robust fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms incorporating local information for image segmentation. Pattern Recognit. 2007;40:825–838
  32. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vision. 1988;1:321–331
  33. Hua L, Thorstad WL, Biehl KJ, et al. A novel PET tumor delineation method based on adaptive region-growing and dualfront active contours. Med Phys. 2008;35:3711–3721
  34. Roerdink JBTM, Meijster A. The watershed transform: definitions, algorithms and parallelization strategies. Fundam Inform. 2001;41:187–228
  35. Geets X, Lee JA, Bol A, Lonneux M, Grégoire V. A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation. Eur J Nucl Med. 2007;34:1427–1438
  36. Marroquin JL, Santana EA, Botello S. Hidden Markov measure field models for image segmentation. IEEE Trans PAMI. 2003;25:1380–1387
  37. Chen JL, Gunn SR, Nixon MS, Gunn RN. Markov random field models for segmentation of PET images. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2001;2082:468–474
  38. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932–945
  39. Kirov AS, Piao JZ, Schmidtlein CR. Partial volume effect correction in PET using regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on local topology. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:2577–2591
  40. Boussion N, Cheze Le Rest C, Hatt M, Visvikis D. Incorporation of wavelet-based denoising in iterative deconvolution for partial volume correction in whole-body pet imaging. Eur J Nucl Med. 2009;36:1064–1075
  41. Erdi YE, Mawlawi O, Larson SM, et al. Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positron emission tomography image thresholding. Cancer. 1997;80:2505S–2509S
  42. Greco C, Nehmeh SA, Schöder H, et al. Evaluation of different methods of 18F-FDG-PET target volume delineation in the radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:439–445
  43. Schinagl DAX, Hoffmann AL, Vogel WV, et al. Can FDG-PET assist in radiotherapy target volume definition of metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck cancer?. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:95–100
  44. Yu W, Fu X-L, Zhang Y-J, et al. GTV spatial conformity between different delineation methods by 18FDG PET/CT and pathology in oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:441–446
  45. Wang H, Vees H, Miralbell R, et al. 18F-fluorocholine PET-guided target volume delineation techniques for partial prostate re-irradiation in local recurrent prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:220–225
  46. van Dalen JA, Hoffmann AL, Dicken V, et al. A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:485–493
  47. Vauclin S, Doyeux K, Hapdey S, Edet-Sanson A, Vera P, Gardin I. Development of a generic thresholding algorithm for the delineation of 18FDG-PET-positive tissue: application to the comparison of three thresholding models. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:6901–6916
  48. Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1431–1434
  49. Wang D, Schultz CJ, Jursinic PA, et al. Initial experience of FDG-PET/CT-guided IMRT of head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:143–151
  50. Yaremko B, Riauka T, Robinson D, Murray B, McEwan A, Roa W. Threshold modification for tumour imaging in non-small-cell lung cancer using positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Commun. 2005;26:433–440
  51. Ciernik IF, Huser M, Burger C, Davis JB, Szekely G. Automated functional image-guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:893–900
  52. Daisne J-F, Sibomana M, Bol A, Doumont T, Lonneux M, Grégoire V. Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. Radiother Oncol. 2003;69:247–250
  53. Ciernik IF, Dizendorf E, Baumert BG, et al. Radiation treatment based on an integrated computer-assisted positron emission tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:853–863
  54. Davis JB, Reiner B, Huser M, Burger C, Szekely G, Ciernik IF. Assessment of (18)F PET signals for automatic target volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiother Oncol. 2006;80:43–50
  55. Drever L, Robinson DM, McEwan A, Roa W. A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for pet target volume delineation. Med Phys. 2006;33:1583–1594
  56. Biehl KJ, Kong F-M, Dehdashti F, et al. 18F-FDG PET definition of gross tumor volume for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: Is a single standardized uptake value threshold approach appropriate?. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1808–1812
  57. Black QC, Grills IS, Kestin LL, et al. Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60:1272–1282
  58. Brambilla M, Matheoud R, Secco C, Loi G, Krengli M, Inglese E. Threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation in radiation treatment planning: the role of target-to-background ratio and target size. Med Phys. 2008;35:1207–1213
  59. Bailey DE. Data acquisition and performance characterization in PET. In:  Valk PE,  Bailey DL,  Townsend DW,  Maisey MN editor. Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. Springer; 2004;p. 69–90
  60. Kessler RM, Ellis JR, Eden M. Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:514–522
  61. King MA, Long DT, Brill AB. SPECT volume quantitation: influence of spatial resolution, source size and shape, and voxel size. Med Phys. 1991;18:1016–1024
  62. Hofheinz F, Dittrich S, Pötzsch C, Hoff J. Effects of cold sphere walls in PET phantom measurements on the volume reproducing threshold. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:1099–1113
  63. Stute S, Tylski P, Grotus N, Buvat I. LuCaS: Efficient Monte Carlo simulations of highly realistic PET tumor images. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. IEEE. 2008; p. 4010–12.
  64. Nehmeh SA, El-Zeftawy H, Greco C, et al. An iterative technique to segment PET lesions using a Monte Carlo based mathematical model. Med Phys. 2009;36:4803–4809
  65. Defrise M, Kinahan PE, Michel C. Image reconstruction algorithms in PET. In:  Valk PE,  Bailey DL,  Townsend DW,  Maisey MN editor. Positron emission tomography: basic science and clinical practice. Springer; 2004;p. 91–114
  66. Ford EC, Kinahan PE, Hanlon L, et al. Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: threshold contouring and lesion volumes. Med Phys. 2006;33:4280–4288
  67. Wong WL, Hussain K, Chevretton E, et al. Validation and clinical application of computer-combined computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose head and neck images. Am J Surg. 1996;172:628–632
  68. Stroom J, Blaauwgeers H, van Baardwijk A, et al. K. Feasibility of pathology-correlated lung imaging for accurate target definition of lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:267–275
  69. Dice LR. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945;26:297–302
  70. Zou KH, Warfield SK, Bharatha A, et al. Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:178–189
  71. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proc 14th Int Jt Conf Art Intell. 1995;2:1137–1143
  72. Christian N, Lee JA, Bol A, De Bast M, Jordan B, Grégoire V. The limitation of PET imaging for biological adaptive-IMRT assessed in animal models. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:101–106
  73. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:876–881
  74. Alessio A, Kinahan P, Lewellen T. Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3D whole body PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25:828–837
  75. Panin V, Ren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2006;50:4507–4526
  76. Reader AJ. The promise of new PET image reconstruction. Phys Med. 2008;24:49–56

PII: S0167-8140(10)00386-5

doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.003

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 3 , Pages 302-307 , September 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution