« Previous
Next »
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 95, Issue 1
, Pages 1-2
, April 2010
Leveraging clinical performance by technological excellence – The case of particle therapy
References
- . Secondary neutrons in clinical proton radiotherapy: a charged issue. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:165–170
- . Dose painting with IMPT, helical tomotherapy and IMXT: a dosimetric comparison. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:30–34
- . Sensitivity of intensity modulated proton therapy plans to changes in patient weight. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:187–194
- . Can protons improve SBRT for lung lesions? Dosimetric considerations. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:368–375
- . Abdominal cancer during early childhood: a dosimetric comparison of proton beams to standard and advanced photon radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:141–149
- . Second cancers in children treated with modern radiotherapy techniques. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:135–140
- Dosimetric comparison of four different external beam partial breast irradiation techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, helical tomotherapy, and proton beam therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:66–73
- . Long-term results of stereotactic proton beam radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:208–212
- . Dose escalation with proton or photon radiation treatment for pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:238–243
- Proton vs carbon ion beams in the definitive radiation therapy of cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:3–22
- For the Swedish proton therapy centre project. Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:257–271
- Proton therapy: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness. Radiother Oncol. 2007;83:123–132
- A systematic literature review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hadron therapy in cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007;83:110–122
- . Proton therapy in lung cancer: clinical outcomes and technical issues. A systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:154–164
- . Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: overkill or overdue?. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:142–147
- Should positive phase III clinical trial data be required before proton beam therapy is more widely adopted? No. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:148–153
- . Trials and tribulations in charged particle radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:23–31
- . Direct comparison of biologically optimized spread-out Bragg peaks for protons and carbon ions. Radiother Oncol. 2008;70:262–266
- . Fallacies in the arguments for new technology: the case of proton therapy. J Med Ethics. 2009;35:684–687
- . Particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT) – integrated research-driven university-hospital-based radiation oncology service in Heidelberg, Germany. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:41–44
- Carbon ion radiation therapy for high-risk meningiomas. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:54–59
- The biological effectiveness of antiproton irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2006;81:233–242
- Antiproton radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:14–19
- . Spread-out antiproton beams deliver poor physical dose distributions for radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:79–86
- . Comparison of optimized single and multifield irradiation plans of antiproton, proton and carbon ion beams. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:87–93
- . Cost-effectiveness of particle therapy: current evidence and future needs. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:127–134
PII: S0167-8140(10)00181-7
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.018
« Previous
Next »
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 95, Issue 1
, Pages 1-2
, April 2010
