Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 1 , Pages 43-47, July 2010

Migration of intraprostatic fiducial markers and its influence on the matching quality in external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Département de Radio-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal – Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Received 7 December 2009; received in revised form 9 March 2010; accepted 13 March 2010. published online 09 April 2010.

Abstract 

Purpose

To assess the influence of fiducial marker (FM) migration on the matching quality in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

The position of FMs were identified using on-board kV imaging (OBI) and their 3-D position established using an in-house reconstruction algorithm for 31 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. To carry out the match, the positions were overlaid on the digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) generated from the planning CT. The distance between each FM was calculated for seven treatments throughout the EBRT course. Four radiotherapy technologists were asked to independently perform and rate the match from OBI to DRR which was then correlated to the extent of FM migration.

Results

All the matches were rated by at least three radiotherapy technologists as “very easy” (“easy” subgroup) for 24 patients (77%), while the other seven patients had their match rated less than “very easy” and considered the “not easy” subgroup. The average daily FM migration was 0.93±0.34mm for the “easy” subgroup vs. 1.82±0.75mm for the latter. An average migration >2mm was seen in five/seven patients in the “not easy” subgroup as compared to none in the “easy” subgroup. There was a trend towards less FM migration and better matching if the planning CT was done later than the day of the FM implant (p=0.093).

Conclusions

FM migration >2mm predicts for a more difficult matching process; PTV margins might have to be adjusted or the planning CT repeated.

Keywords: Fiducial markers, Prostate cancer, Radiotherapy, CT scan

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(10)00180-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.03.017

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 96, Issue 1 , Pages 43-47, July 2010