Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 94, Issue 3 , Pages 386-387, March 2010

Comment on Moerland et al. study of decline of dose coverage between different implant techniques for I125 prostate brachytherapy

St James’s Institute of Oncology Medical Physics and Engineering, St James’s Hospital, Leeds, UK Tel.: +44 0113 2067409.

Received 11 December 2009; accepted 29 January 2010. published online 08 March 2010.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.

PII: S0167-8140(10)00072-1

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.020

Refers to article:

  • In response to the “Letter to the editor” by Al-Qaisieh et al.: Decline of dose coverage between intraoperative planning and post implant dosimetry for I-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy: Comparison between loose and stranded seed implants , 22 February 2010

    M.A. Moerland, M.J.H. van Deursen, S.G. Elias, M. van Vulpen, I.M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz, J.J. Battermann
    Radiotherapy & Oncology March 2010 (Vol. 94, Issue 3, Page 386)

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 94, Issue 3 , Pages 386-387, March 2010

Article Tools