Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 94, Issue 3 , Pages 367-374, March 2010

Applying failure mode effects and criticality analysis in radiotherapy: Lessons learned and perspectives of enhancement

  • Marta Scorsetti

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Chiara Signori

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 – Rozzano (MI), Italy.
  • ,
  • Paola Lattuada

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Gaetano Urso

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Mario Bignardi

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Pierina Navarria

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Simona Castiglioni

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Pietro Mancosu

      Affiliations

    • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
  • ,
  • Paolo Trucco

      Affiliations

    • Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

Received 6 July 2009; received in revised form 11 December 2009; accepted 29 December 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

The radiation oncology process along with its unique therapeutic properties is also potentially dangerous for the patient, and thus it should be delivered under a systematic risk control. To this aim incident reporting and analysis are not sufficient for assuring patient safety and proactive risk assessment should also be implemented. The paper accounts for some methodological solutions, lessons learned and opportunities for improvement, starting from the systematic application of the failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) technique to the radiotherapy process of an Italian hospital.

Materials and methods

The analysis, performed by a working group made of experts of the radiotherapy unit, was organised into the following steps: (1) complete and detailed analysis of the process (integration definition for function modelling); (2) identification of possible failure modes (FM) of the process, representing sources of adverse events for the patient; (3) qualitative risk assessment of FMs, aimed at identifying priorities of intervention; (4) identification and planning of corrective actions.

Results

Organisational and procedural corrective measures were implemented; a set of safety indexes for the process was integrated within the traditional quality assurance indicators measured by the unit. A strong commitment of all the professionals involved was observed and the study revealed to be a powerful “tool” for dissemination of patient safety culture.

Conclusion

The feasibility of FMECA in fostering radiotherapy safety was proven; nevertheless, some lessons learned as well as weaknesses of current practices in risk management open to future research for the integration of retrospective methods (e.g. incident reporting or root cause analysis) and risk assessment.

Keywords: Risk analysis, Process analysis, FMECA, Lessons learned

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(10)00017-4

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.040

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 94, Issue 3 , Pages 367-374, March 2010