« Previous
Next »
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3
, Pages 553-558
, December 2009
Evaluation of the impact of dental artefacts on intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning for the head and neck
References
- . On the radiobiological impact of metal artefacts in head and neck IMRT in terms of tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Med Biol Eng Comput. 2007;45:1045–1051
- . The impact of metal artefacts on head and neck IMRT dose distributions. Radiother Oncol. 2006;79:198–202
- . High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements. Radiother Oncol. 2006;81:309–314
- . Biological evaluation of treatment plans. In: Mayles P, Nahum A, Rosenwald J editor. Handbook of radiotherapy physics. Taylor & Francis; 2007;p. 738
- . Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16:1623–1630
- . Dose, volume and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:577–587
- . The influence of metal artefacts on the range of ion beams. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:635–644
- . Dose perturbation in the presence of metallic implants: treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:3295–3305
- . Analysis of the motion of oropharyngeal tumours and consequences in planning target volume determination. Radiother Oncol. 2008;87:268–273
- ICRP. Prevention of accidents to patients undergoing radiation therapy. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP); 2000.
PII: S0167-8140(09)00572-6
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.10.006
© 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3
, Pages 553-558
, December 2009
