Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 253-258, November 2009

Justification for inter-fraction correction of catheter movement in fractionated high dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer

Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Middlesex, UK

Received 23 December 2008; received in revised form 5 June 2009; accepted 19 September 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

Fractionated high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer relies on reproducible catheter positions for each fraction to ensure adequate tumour coverage while minimising dose to normal tissues. Peri-prostatic oedema may cause caudal displacement of the catheters relative to the prostate gland between fractions. This can be corrected for by changing source dwell positions or by physical re-advancement of catheters before treatment.

Materials and methods

Data for 20 consecutive monotherapy patients receiving three HDR fractions of 10.5Gy per fraction over 2days were analysed retrospectively. Pre-treatment CT scans were used to assess the effect of catheter movement between fractions on implant quality, with and without movement correction. Implant quality was evaluated using dosimetric parameters.

Results

Compared to the first fraction (f1) the mean inter-fraction caudal movement relative to the prostate base was 7.9mm (f2) (range 0–21mm) and 3.9mm (f3) (range 0–25.5mm). PTV D90% was reduced without movement correction by a mean of 27.8% (f2) and 32.3% (f3), compared with 5.3% and 5.1%, respectively, with catheter movement correction. Dose to 2cc of the rectum increased by a mean of 0.69 (f2) and 0.76Gy (f3) compared with an increase of 0.03 and 0.04Gy, respectively, with correction. The urethra V12 also increased by a mean of 0.36 (f2) and 0.39Gy (f3) compared with 0.06 and 0.16Gy, respectively, with correction.

Conclusions

Inter-fraction correction for catheter movement using pre-treatment imaging is critical to maintain the quality of an implant. Without movement correction there is significant risk of tumour under-dosage and normal tissue over-dosage. The findings of this study justify additional imaging between fractions in order to carry out correction.

Keywords: Catheter movement, Prostate, HDR brachytherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00563-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.015

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 253-258, November 2009