Journal Home
Search for

Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 253-258 (November 2009)


View previous. 18 of 41 View next.

Justification for inter-fraction correction of catheter movement in fractionated high dose-rate brachytherapy treatment of prostate cancer

Tania SimnorCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Sonia Li, Gerry Lowe, Peter Ostler, Linda Bryant, Caroline Chapman, Dave Inchley, Peter J. Hoskin

Received 23 December 2008; received in revised form 5 June 2009; accepted 19 September 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

Fractionated high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer relies on reproducible catheter positions for each fraction to ensure adequate tumour coverage while minimising dose to normal tissues. Peri-prostatic oedema may cause caudal displacement of the catheters relative to the prostate gland between fractions. This can be corrected for by changing source dwell positions or by physical re-advancement of catheters before treatment.

Materials and methods

Data for 20 consecutive monotherapy patients receiving three HDR fractions of 10.5Gy per fraction over 2days were analysed retrospectively. Pre-treatment CT scans were used to assess the effect of catheter movement between fractions on implant quality, with and without movement correction. Implant quality was evaluated using dosimetric parameters.

Results

Compared to the first fraction (f1) the mean inter-fraction caudal movement relative to the prostate base was 7.9mm (f2) (range 0–21mm) and 3.9mm (f3) (range 0–25.5mm). PTV D90% was reduced without movement correction by a mean of 27.8% (f2) and 32.3% (f3), compared with 5.3% and 5.1%, respectively, with catheter movement correction. Dose to 2cc of the rectum increased by a mean of 0.69 (f2) and 0.76Gy (f3) compared with an increase of 0.03 and 0.04Gy, respectively, with correction. The urethra V12 also increased by a mean of 0.36 (f2) and 0.39Gy (f3) compared with 0.06 and 0.16Gy, respectively, with correction.

Conclusions

Inter-fraction correction for catheter movement using pre-treatment imaging is critical to maintain the quality of an implant. Without movement correction there is significant risk of tumour under-dosage and normal tissue over-dosage. The findings of this study justify additional imaging between fractions in order to carry out correction.

Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Middlesex, UK

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK.

PII: S0167-8140(09)00563-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.015


View previous. 18 of 41 View next.