Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 524-529, December 2009

Risk factors for voice quality after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer

  • Irena Hočevar-Boltežar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: University Medical Center, Department of ORL & CFS, Zaloška cesta 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • ,
  • Miha Žargi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • ,
  • Primož Strojan

      Affiliations

    • Institut of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Received 10 April 2009; received in revised form 15 September 2009; accepted 29 September 2009. published online 21 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

In the majority of patients irradiated for early glottic cancer an abnormal voice was reported. The purpose of the study was to determine the factors influencing voice quality after radiotherapy for T1 glottic cancer.

Methods

The voices of 75 male patients irradiated for T1 glottic carcinoma were assessed subjectively and objectively by acoustic analyses and aerodynamic measurements. The laryngeal function and morphology were evaluated by videolaryngostroboscopy. The data on smoking habits, the associated diseases influencing voice quality, the extent of the tumor, the type of biopsy, and the irradiation technique were collected from the medical records. The data on the factors influencing voice quality were compared for patients with a normal/near-normal voice and those with a hoarse voice.

Results

Voice quality was at least slightly abnormal in 94.7% and 81.3% of patients, when assessed perceptively and objectively, respectively. Smoking after the completed treatment, more severe morphologic alterations of the vocal folds, dryness of the throat, incomplete closure of the vocal folds and functional voice disorders expressed as supraglottic activity adversely influenced the voice quality. A good correlation between the perceptive voice assessment and the acoustic analyses was established.

Conclusions

After the successful irradiation for T1 glottic carcinoma, the great majority of the patients have at least a slightly hoarse voice. A better voice outcome could be achieved if radiotherapy was followed by the patient’s cessation of smoking and the appropriate voice therapy.

Keywords: Glottis cancer, Irradiation, Voice quality, Acoustic analysis, Perceptive evaluation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00562-3

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.09.014

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 524-529, December 2009