Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 492-497, December 2009

A randomized phase II study of CEOP with or without semustine as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IE/IIE extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in the upper aerodigestive tract

  • Xuejun Ma

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology
    • Contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Ye Guo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology
    • Contributed equally to this study.
  • ,
  • Ziqiang Pang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • ,
  • Biyun Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Oncology
  • ,
  • Hongfen Lu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology; and
  • ,
  • Ya-Jia Gu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
  • ,
  • Xiaomao Guo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 270 Dong An Road, Shanghai 200032, China.

Received 31 March 2009; received in revised form 15 August 2009; accepted 30 August 2009. published online 27 September 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

In this randomized phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy of semustine added to CEOP regimen as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IE/IIE extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type in the upper aerodigestive tract.

Patients and methods

Seventy-five eligible patients were randomized to receive either CEOP or CEOP plus semustine followed by involved-field radiotherapy.

Results

The overall response rate of induction chemotherapy was 57.9% in CEOP arm compared with 62.2% in CEOP plus semustine arm (P=0.71). With a median follow-up of 30.1months, 2-year overall survival was 73.3% and 62.2%, respectively (P=0.37). Toxicities in both arms were comparable and manageable. Through univariate and multivariate analysis, PS of 2, Stage IIE and elevated LDH level were identified to be adverse prognostic factors. A new prognostic index categorized three groups of patients (low risk, no adverse factors; intermediate risk, one factor; and high risk, 2 or 3 factors) with highly significant difference of prognosis. Two-year overall survival was 87.5%, 60.6% and 30%, respectively (P=0.0002).

Conclusions

The addition of semustine to CEOP regimen was not associated with improved efficacy. More effective treatment needs to be explored in patients with intermediate or high risk.

Keywords: NK/T-cell lymphoma, Chemotherapy, Semustine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00497-6

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.045

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 492-497, December 2009