Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 609-617 , December 2009

Unintended exposure in radiotherapy: Identification of prominent causes

  • Mary Boadu

      Affiliations

    • International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
    • Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, Accra, Ghana
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Radiological and Medical Sciences Research Institute, Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box LG 80, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
    • ,
  • Madan Mohan Rehani

      Affiliations

    • International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria

Received 15 May 2008 ,Revised 26 August 2009 ,Accepted 27 August 2009.

References 

  1. Thwaites DI, Williams JR, Aird EG, Klevenhagen SC, Williams PC. A dosimetric intercomparison of megavoltage photons beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37:445–461
  2. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X- or gamma-rays in radiotherapy procedures. ICRU Report 24, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement, Bethesda, MD; 1976.
  3. International Standards Organisation. Quality management and quality assurance standards: Part I. Guidelines for selection and use, ISO 9000, ISO, Geneva; 1994.
  4. World Health Organisation. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. WHO, Geneva; 1988.
  5. Thwaites DI, Scalliet P, Leer JW, Overgaard J. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. (European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. Advisory Report to the Commission of the European Union for the ‘Europe Against Cancer Programme’). Radiother Oncol. 1995;35:61–73
  6. Leer JW, McKenzie AL, Scalliet P, Thwaites DI. Practical guidelines for the implementation of a quality system in radiotherapy (European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. A project of the ESTRO Quality Assurance Committee sponsored by ‘Europe against Cancer’). Physics for Clinical Radiotherapy Booklet No. 4, ESTRO, Brussels; 1998.
  7. International Atomic Energy Agency. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. IAEA-TECDOC 989, IAEA, Vienna; 1997.
  8. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology. Report of AAPM Task Group 40. Med Phys 1994;21:581–618.
  9. Clinical Oncology Information Network. Guidelines for external beam radiotherapy. Royal College of Radiologists. Clin Oncol 1999;11:S135–72.
  10. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment–medical electron accelerators: functional performance characteristics, IEC 976, IEC, Geneva; 1989.
  11. Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Physics aspects of quality control in radiotherapy. Report 81. York, United Kingdom: IPEM; 1998.
  12. Ferreira HI, Dutreix A, Bridier A, Chavaudra J, Svensson H. The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL). Radiother Oncol. 2000;55:273–284
  13. Roue A, Ferreira IH, Dam JV, Svensson H, Venselaar JLM. The EQUAL-ESTRO audit on geometric reconstruction techniques in brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78:78–83
  14. Izewska J, Andreo P, Vatnitsky S, Shortt KR. The IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose quality audits for radiotherapy: a perspective of dosimetry practices at hospitals in developing countries. Radiother Oncol. 2003;69:91–97
  15. Nisbet A, Thwaites DI. A dosimetric intercomparison of electron beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Phys Med Biol. 1997;42:2393–2409
  16. Bonnett DE, Mills JA, Aukett RJ, Martin-Smith P. The development of an interdepartmental audit as part of a physics quality assurance programme for external beam therapy. Br J Radiol. 1994;67:275–282
  17. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labour Organisation, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organisation, World Health Organisation. International basic safety standards for protection against ionising radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. IAEA Safety Series 115, IAEA, Vienna; 1996.
  18. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and the safety of radiation sources. IAEA Safety Series 120, IAEA, Vienna; 1996.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiological protection for medical exposure to ionizing radiation. IAEA Safety Standards Series RS-G-1.5, IAEA, Vienna; 2002.
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency. Regulatory control of radiation sources. IAEA Safety Standards Series GS-G-1.5, IAEA, Vienna; 2004.
  21. International Atomic Energy Agency. Design and implementation of a radiotherapy programme: clinical, medical physics, radiation protection and safety aspects. IAEA-TECDOC 1040, IAEA, Vienna; 2002.
  22. International Atomic Energy Agency. Applying radiation safety standards in radiotherapy. IAEA Safety Reports Series 38, IAEA, Vienna; 2006.
  23. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities. IAEA Safety Reports Series 47, IAEA, Vienna; 2006.
  24. International Atomic Energy Agency. Lessons learned from accidental exposures in radiotherapy. IAEA Safety Reports Series 17, IAEA, Vienna; 2000.
  25. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Prevention of accidental exposure to patients undergoing radiation therapy. ICRP Publication 86. Oxford; Pergamon Press: 2000.
  26. International Atomic Energy Agency. The radiological accident in Goiânia. IAEA, Vienna; 1988.
  27. International Atomic Energy Agency. Accidental overexposure of radiotherapy patients in San Jose Costa Rica. IAEA, Vienna; 1998.
  28. International Atomic Energy Agency. The radiological accident in Istanbul. IAEA, Vienna; 2000.
  29. International Atomic Energy Agency. Investigation of an accidental overexposure of patients in Panama. IAEA, Vienna; 2001.
  30. International Atomic Energy Agency. The radiological accident in Samut Prakarn. IAEA, Vienna; 2002.
  31. International Atomic Energy Agency. Accidental overexposure of radiotherapy patients in Bialystok. IAEA, Vienna; 2004.
  32. Unintended overexposure of patient Lisa Norris during radiotherapy treatment at the Beatson Oncology Centre Glasgow in January 2006. Report of the investigation by Inspector appointed by the Scottish Ministers for the Ionizing Radiation (Medical Exposures) Regulations; 2000. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/10/27084909/0.
  33. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Gamma knife treatment to wrong side of brain. Event Notification Report 43746; 2007.
  34. Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire. Cancer radiotherapy: a justified practice but one that demands considerable stringency on the part of the operators and vigilant supervision by ANS. Annual Report. ANS; 2006.
  35. Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire. Report concerning the radiotherapy incident at the university hospital centre (CHU) in Toulouse – Rangueil Hospital. ASN; 2007.
  36. Holmberg O, McClean B. Preventing treatment errors in radiotherapy by identifying and evaluating near-misses and actual incidents. J Radiother Pract. 2002;3:13–25
  37. Williams MV. Improving patient safety in radiotherapy by learning from near-misses, incidents and errors. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:297–301
  38. Shafiq J, Barton M, Noble D, Lemer C, Donaldson LJ. An international review of patient safety measures in radiotherapy practice. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92:15–21
  39. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near-miss reporting systems. Br Med J. 2000;320:759–763
  40. International Atomic Energy Agency. Terminology used in nuclear safety and radiation protection. IAEA Safety Glossary 2007 edition, IAEA, Vienna; 2007. Available from http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1290_web.pdf.
  41. Leunens G, Verstraete J, Bogaert W, et al. Human errors in data transfer during the preparation and delivery of radiation treatment affecting the final result: “garbage in, garbage out”. Radiother Oncol. 1992;23:217–222
  42. Yeung TK, Bortolotto K, Cosby S, Hoar M, Lederer E. Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period. Radiother Oncol. 2005;74:283–291

☆ The views expressed in this paper are those of authors’, rather than that of the organizations they belong to.

PII: S0167-8140(09)00496-4

doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.044

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 609-617 , December 2009

Article Tools