Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 462-467 , December 2009

The effect of planning algorithms in oesophageal radiotherapy in the context of the SCOPE 1 trial

  • Lucy Wills

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Road, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK.
  • ,
  • Anthony Millin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
  • ,
  • Jennifer Paterson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
  • ,
  • Tom Crosby

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
  • ,
  • John Staffurth

      Affiliations

    • School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Received 30 January 2009 ,Revised 21 August 2009 ,Accepted 24 August 2009.

References 

  1. Ahnesjö A. Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Med Phys. 1989;16:577–592
  2. Ahnesjö A. A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation. Med Phys. 1992;19:263–273
  3. Aspradakis M, Morrison R, Richmond N, Steele A. Experimental verification of convolution/superposition photon dose calculations for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:2873–2893
  4. Nisbet A, Beange I, Vollmar HS, Irvine C, Morgan A, Thwaites D. Dosimetric verification of a commercial collapsed cone algorithm in simulated clinical situations. Radiother Oncol. 2004;73:79–88
  5. Knöös T, Wieslander E, Cozzi L, Brink C, Fogliata A, Albers D, et al. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms for treatment planning in external beam therapy for clinical situations. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:5785–5807
  6. Gershkevitsh E, Schmidt R, Velez G, Miller D, Korf E, Yip F, et al. Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: results of IAEA pilot study. Radiother Oncol. 2008;89:338–346
  7. Morgan AM, Knöös T, McNee SG, Evans CJ, Thwaites DI. Clinical implications of the implementation of advanced treatment planning algorithms for thoracic treatments. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:48–54
  8. Pearson M, Atherton P, McMenemin R, McDonald F, Mazdai G, Mulvenna P, et al. The implementation of an advanced treatment planning algorithm in the treatment of lung cancer with conventional radiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2009;21:168–174
  9. van Elmpt Wouter, Öllers Michel, Velders Marije, Poels Kim, Mijnheer Ben, De Ruysscher Dirk, et al. Transition from a simple to a more advanced calculation algorithm for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): implications for clinical implementation in an individualized dose-escalation protocol. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:326–334
  10. Koelbl O, Krieger T, Haedinger U, Sauer O, Flentje M. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Strahlenther Onkol. 2004;12:783–788,
  11. Vanderstraeten B, Reynaert N, Pealinck L, Madani I, De Wagter C, De Gersem W, et al. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: a comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and Pencil Beam computations. Med Phys. 2006;33:3149–3158
  12. Venables K, Winfield E, Deighton A, Aird E, Hoskin P. A survey of radiotherapy quality control practice in the United Kingdom for the START trial. Radiother Oncol. 2001;60:311–318
  13. Aird EGA, Williams C, Mott GTM, Dische S, Saunders MI. Quality assurance in the CHART clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 1995;36:235–244
  14. The Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, National Patient Safety Agency, British Institute of Radiology. Towards safer radiotherapy. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2008.
  15. ICRU Report 50: prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy. International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements; 1993.
  16. ICRU report 62: prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam therapy (supplement to ICRU report 50). International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements; 1993.
  17. Steidley KD, Gamper C, Geener A, Caggiano A. A Clarkson’s sector integration routine for personal computers. Med Phys. 1994;21:61–64
  18. Armitage P, Berry G. In: Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed.. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994;
  19. Altman DG, Gardiner MJ. Means and their differences. In:  Altman DG,  Machin D,  Bryant TN,  Gardiner MJ editor. Statistics with confidence. 2nd ed.. London, UK: BMJ Books; 2000;p. 28–35[chapter 4]
  20. Cho BCJ, Van herk M, Mijnheer B, Bartelink H. The effect of set up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose–volume histograms. Med Phys. 2002;29:2305–2318
  21. Guckenberger M, Wilbert J, Krieger T, et al. Four-dimensional treatment planning for SBRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:276–285
  22. Lorchel F, Dumas JL, Noel A, Wolf D, Bosset JF, Aletti P, et al. Cancer: determination of internal target volume for conformal therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2006;80:327–332

PII: S0167-8140(09)00469-1

doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.036

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 462-467 , December 2009