Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 625-632, December 2009

Modulated electron radiotherapy treatment planning using a photon multileaf collimator for post-mastectomized chest walls

  • Francisco Javier Salguero

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
    • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
  • ,
  • Bianey Palma

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
    • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
  • ,
  • Rafael Arrans

      Affiliations

    • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
  • ,
  • Joan Rosello

      Affiliations

    • Servicio de Radiofísica-ERESA, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain
  • ,
  • Antonio Leal

      Affiliations

    • Departamento de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain
    • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Departamento de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.

Received 12 February 2009; received in revised form 13 August 2009; accepted 13 August 2009. published online 16 September 2009.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of using a photon MLC (xMLC) for modulated electron radiotherapy treatment (MERT) as an alternative to conventional post-mastectomy chest wall (CW) irradiation. A Monte Carlo (MC) based planning system was developed to overcome the inaccuracy of the ‘pencil beam’ algorithm. MC techniques are known to accurately calculate the dose distributions of electron beams, allowing the explicit simulation of electron interactions within the MLC.

Materials and methods

Four real clinical CW cases were planned using MERT which were compared with the conventional electron treatments based on blocks and by a straightforward approach using the MLC, and not the blocks (as an intermediate step to MERT) to shape the same segments with SSD between 60 and 70cm depending on PTV size. MC calculations were verified with an array of ionization chambers and radiochromic films in a solid water phantom.

Results

Tests based on gamma analysis between MC dose distributions and radiochromic film measurements showed an excellent agreement. Differences in the absolute dose measured with a plane-parallel chamber at a reference point were below 3% for all cases. MERT solution showed a better PTV coverage and a significant reduction of the doses to the organs at risk (OARs).

Conclusion

MERT can effectively improve the current electron treatments by obtaining a better PTV coverage and sparing healthy tissues. More directly, block-shaped treatments could be replaced by MLC-shaped non-modulated segments providing similar results.

Keywords: Modulated electron radiotherapy, Monte Carlo treatment planning, Chest wall

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00458-7

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.021

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 3 , Pages 625-632, December 2009