Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions: Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies
Received 22 July 2008; received in revised form 29 July 2009; accepted 11 August 2009. published online 22 September 2009.
Abstract
Purpose
To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT).
Methods and materials
HT unit provides megavoltage – CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom.
To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied.
Results
Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6mm (±0.5mm) for each of the three main axes.
The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th–10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error <2mm for all directions was in any case found at 3th–4th session. This result was also confirmed by the effective systematic set-up error analysis, with a minimum value within 1.5mm nearly at the 4th or 5th fraction.
Conclusions
Although the minimum systematic residual error is reached at 7th–10th treatment session, the effective systematic set-up error analysis confirmed that an off-line correction at the 4th fraction without any action level may be a robust compromise with a large sparing of time and resources compared to on-line correction.