Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 246-252, November 2009

Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions: Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies

  • Sara Broggi

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy.
  • ,
  • Cesare Cozzarini

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudio Fiorino

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Eleonora Maggiulli

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Filippo Alongi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Nadia Di Muzio

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Riccardo Calandrino

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy

Received 22 July 2008; received in revised form 29 July 2009; accepted 11 August 2009. published online 22 September 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT).

Methods and materials

HT unit provides megavoltage – CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom.

To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied.

Results

Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6mm (±0.5mm) for each of the three main axes.

The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th–10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error <2mm for all directions was in any case found at 3th–4th session. This result was also confirmed by the effective systematic set-up error analysis, with a minimum value within 1.5mm nearly at the 4th or 5th fraction.

Conclusions

Although the minimum systematic residual error is reached at 7th–10th treatment session, the effective systematic set-up error analysis confirmed that an off-line correction at the 4th fraction without any action level may be a robust compromise with a large sparing of time and resources compared to on-line correction.

Keywords: Set-up errors, Image-guided radiotherapy, Correction strategies

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00443-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.029

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 246-252, November 2009