Journal Home
Search for

Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 246-252 (November 2009)


View previous. 17 of 41 View next.

Modeling set-up error by daily MVCT for prostate adjuvant treatment delivered in 20 fractions: Implications for the assessment of the optimal correction strategies

Sara BroggiaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Cesare Cozzarinib, Claudio Fiorinoa, Eleonora Maggiullia, Filippo Alongib, Giovanni Mauro Cattaneoa, Nadia Di Muziob, Riccardo Calandrinoa

Received 22 July 2008; received in revised form 29 July 2009; accepted 11 August 2009. published online 22 September 2009.

Abstract 

Purpose

To optimise image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) approaches in set-up error correction for hypofractionated adjuvant treatment of prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy (HT).

Methods and materials

HT unit provides megavoltage – CT (MVCT) imaging capability for daily patient set-up. The intrinsic uncertainty of the available image registration techniques was first investigated on a pelvic phantom.

To optimise different set-up correction strategies, MVCT data of 37 patients treated with 58Gy delivered in 20 fractions were analyzed. 620 MVCT images were globally available for the analysis. Daily on-line set-up correction without any action level was applied for 27/37 patients. The residual and the effective set-up error were assessed. For 10/37 patients an off-line correction strategy with an action level was applied.

Results

Phantom measurements showed an intrinsic uncertainty in MVCT imaging and registration around 0.6mm (±0.5mm) for each of the three main axes.

The minimum value of the residual systematic error was found at 7th–10th session, with values between 0.7 and 1.1mm (1 SD); a systematic residual error <2mm for all directions was in any case found at 3th–4th session. This result was also confirmed by the effective systematic set-up error analysis, with a minimum value within 1.5mm nearly at the 4th or 5th fraction.

Conclusions

Although the minimum systematic residual error is reached at 7th–10th treatment session, the effective systematic set-up error analysis confirmed that an off-line correction at the 4th fraction without any action level may be a robust compromise with a large sparing of time and resources compared to on-line correction.

a Medical Physics, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy

b Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS S. Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy.

PII: S0167-8140(09)00443-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.029


View previous. 17 of 41 View next.