Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 4-14, July 2009

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients

  • Jean-Pierre Pignon

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Address: Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94 805 VILLEJUIF cedex, France.
  • ,
  • Aurélie le Maître

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Emilie Maillard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • Jean Bourhis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • ,
  • on behalf of the MACH-NC Collaborative Group

      Affiliations

    • Collaborators listed at the end of the paper.

Received 6 April 2009; received in revised form 17 April 2009; accepted 19 April 2009. published online 18 May 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Our previous individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis showed that chemotherapy improved survival in patients curatively treated for non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with a higher benefit with concomitant chemotherapy. However the heterogeneity of the results limited the conclusions and prompted us to confirm the results on a more complete database by adding the randomised trials conducted between 1994 and 2000.

Methods

The updated IPD meta-analysis included trials comparing loco-regional treatment to loco-regional treatment+chemotherapy in HNSCC patients and conducted between 1965 and 2000. The log-rank-test, stratified by trial, was used to compare treatments. The hazard ratios of death were calculated.

Results

Twenty-four new trials, most of them of concomitant chemotherapy, were included with a total of 87 trials and 16,485 patients. The hazard ratio of death was 0.88 (p<0.0001) with an absolute benefit for chemotherapy of 4.5% at 5years, and a significant interaction (p<0.0001) between chemotherapy timing (adjuvant, induction or concomitant) and treatment. Both direct (6 trials) and indirect comparisons showed a more pronounced benefit of the concomitant chemotherapy as compared to induction chemotherapy. For the 50 concomitant trials, the hazard ratio was 0.81 (p<0.0001) and the absolute benefit 6.5% at 5years. There was a decreasing effect of chemotherapy with age (p=0.003, test for trend).

Conclusion

The benefit of concomitant chemotherapy was confirmed and was greater than the benefit of induction chemotherapy.

Keywords: Meta-analysis, Systematic review, Individual patient data, Randomised clinical trials, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Head and neck cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(09)00188-1

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 92, Issue 1 , Pages 4-14, July 2009