Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 164-171, November 2008

Inter- and intraobserver variation in HR-CTV contouring: Intercomparison of transverse and paratransverse image orientation in 3D-MRI assisted cervix cancer brachytherapy

  • Primoz Petric

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    • Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • ,
  • Johannes Dimopoulos

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Johannes Dimopoulos, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • ,
  • Christian Kirisits

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Daniel Berger

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Robert Hudej

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    • Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • ,
  • Richard Pötter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Received 7 October 2007; received in revised form 14 July 2008; accepted 20 July 2008. published online 15 September 2008.

Abstract 

Aim

To analyze agreement between target volumes, delineated by two observers on transverse (T) and paratransverse (perpendicular to the long cervical axis – PT) MR images for cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Materials and methods

In 13 patients, High Risk-CTV (HR-CTV) was outlined by two observers in T and PT MR image plane, respecting the GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations for 3D-image based cervix cancer brachytherapy [1]. Contouring time was measured. HR-CTV sizes were compared, and conformity index (CI) was assessed. Interobserver variations in contour-extent along eight radial directions were compared between delineation planes. After applying a standard treatment plan, an intercomparison of DVH-parameters V100, D90, and D100 for the HR-CTV was carried out.

Results

Contouring time was slightly longer in T than PT orientation. Interplane CI did not differ significantly between observers (0.72 vs. 0.71), nor did the interobserver CI between planes (0.79 vs. 0.78). Variations in contour-extent between different radial directions and interplane deviations in DVH parameters were non-significant.

Conclusion

Contouring in PT, as compared to T plane, allows for a “circumferential view of the cervix” and facilitates comprehensive understanding of spatial relations between the applicator and patho-anatomical structures. It is marked by a lower contouring difficulty and leads to a comparable outcome in terms of DVH parameters. Interobserver inconsistencies can be minimized by systematic training and following the published recommendations.

Keywords: Interobserver analysis, MRI-based cervix cancer brachytherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(08)00392-7

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.030

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 164-171, November 2008