Lung 4D-IMRT treatment planning: An evaluation of three methods applied to four-dimensional data sets

Abstract 

Purpose

To compare 4D-dose distributions for IMRT planning on three data sets: a single 4D-CT phase, a 4D-CT phase with a density override to the tumor motion envelope (TME) volume, and the average intensity projection (AIP).

Methods

Eight planning cases were considered. IMRT inverse planning optimization was performed on each of the three data set types, for each case considered. The plans were then applied to all ten phases of the associated 4D-CT data set. The dose to the GTV in each breathing phase was compared to the TME dose from the optimized dose distribution, as well as the GTV dose determined from a model-based deformable registration algorithm.

Results

IMRT optimization on a single 3D data set resulted in a greater equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to the GTV when applied to a 4D-CT data set than the EUD for the TME in the optimized plan. The difference was up to 5.5Gy in one case. For all cases and planning techniques considered, a maximum difference of 0.3Gy in the NTD_mean to the healthy lung throughout the breathing cycle was found.

Conclusions

For tumors located in the periphery of the lung, optimization on the AIP image resulted in a more uniform GTV dose throughout the breathing cycle. Averages in GTV EUD and healthy lung NTD_mean taken over all the breathing phases were found to be in agreement with the dose effect parameters obtained from model-based deformable registration algorithms. All planning methods yielded GTV EUD values that were larger than the prescribed dose when the full 4D data set was considered.

Keywords: 4D IMRT, Intrafraction motion, Average intensity projection, 4D-CT, Tumor motion