Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 326-334, September 2008

Transition from a simple to a more advanced dose calculation algorithm for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Implications for clinical implementation in an individualized dose-escalation protocol

Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Received 11 March 2008; received in revised form 26 June 2008; accepted 6 July 2008. published online 13 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

To investigate the clinical consequences of the transition from a simple convolution algorithm (CA) to a more advanced superposition dose calculation algorithm (SA) in an individualized isotoxic dose-escalation protocol for NSCLC patients.

Material and methods

First, treatment plans designed according to ICRU50-criteria using the CA were recalculated using the SA, for 16 patients. Next, two additional plans were designed for each patient using only the SA: one with 95%-isodose coverage (ICRU50-criteria), the other allowing PTV coverage with 90%-isodose at the lung side. PTV dose was escalated to a maximum dose of 79.2Gy or lower when limited by either a mean lung dose (MLD) of 19Gy or a maximum spinal cord dose of 54Gy. Equivalent uniform doses (EUD) in the PTV were compared.

Results

Recalculation of the CA plans using the SA, showed PTV underdosage in the CA plans: the median PTV EUD was 61.3Gy (range 44.9–80.4Gy) and 55.5Gy (43.9–76.8Gy), for CA and SA, respectively (p<0.001). Redesigning plans using the SA resulted in an almost identical PTV EUD of 55.1Gy (43.7–79.2Gy). For the subgroup (N=9) with MLD as dose-limiting factor a gain in PTV EUD of 2.7±1.8Gy (p=0.008) was achieved using the 90%-isodose coverage plan.

Conclusions

Plans calculated using the CA caused large PTV underdosage. Plans designed using the SA often lead to lower maximum achievable tumour doses due to higher MLD values. Allowing somewhat relaxed PTV coverage criteria increased the PTV dose again for MLD restricted cases. Consequently, in clinics where isotoxic individual dose-escalation is applied, implementation of an SA should be accompanied by accepting limited PTV underdosage in patients with MLD as the dose-limiting factor.

Keywords: Radiotherapy, Lung cancer, Dose calculation algorithms, Dose-escalation, EUD, Monte Carlo

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(08)00366-6

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.003

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 326-334, September 2008