Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-149, November 2008

Abdominal cancer during early childhood: A dosimetric comparison of proton beams to standard and advanced photon radiotherapy

  • Martin Hillbrand

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Martin Hillbrand, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • ,
  • Dietmar Georg

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Helmut Gadner

      Affiliations

    • St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Richard Pötter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Karin Dieckmann

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, AKH Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Austria

Received 31 January 2008; received in revised form 11 June 2008; accepted 19 June 2008. published online 11 August 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

Evaluation of dosimetric benefits of advanced radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of abdominal lesions during early childhood.

Patients and methods

Treatment planning was performed for five Neuroblastoma (NBL) and four Wilms Tumor (WT) patients. Opposing fields (2F), photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMXT) and two proton techniques (passively scattered (PT) and scanned beams (IMPT)) were considered. Averaged dose-volume histograms, associated dosimetric parameters and a radiobiological model for the estimation of the therapy related carcinogenic effect were evaluated.

Results

With respect to the 2F technique, both proton techniques enabled to reduce mean liver and kidney dose by 40–60%; Organ fractions irradiated at the level of the tolerance dose were reduced by 65% for kidneys and 75% for the liver in NBL patients and by additional 10% for WT patients. IMXT enabled to reduce parameters related to the steep high-dose gradient, e.g., V15Gy for the kidneys was reduced by a factor 2–3 compared to 2F. V12Gy was reduced by 40% in the liver. On the other side, the improvement of those parameters characterizing the low isodose domain was limited for IMXT. The risk for radiation-induced secondary cancer was doubled for IMXT and even more increased for PT if secondary neutrons were taken into account, while this risk remained the same or was reduced by IMPT with respect to 2F.

Conclusions

Proton beams improved all dosimetric parameters for NBL and WT patients compared to photon techniques. This improvement was limited for IMXT mainly to parameters related to the steep high-dose gradient. Further research is needed to minimize uncertainties for secondary cancer estimations.

Keywords: Pediatric cancer, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, Proton therapy, Secondary cancer

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Hereby, we want to state that no actual or potential conflicts of interest exist.

PII: S0167-8140(08)00334-4

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.012

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 141-149, November 2008