Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 310-318, September 2008

Treatment planning comparison between conformal radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in the case of locally advanced-stage NSCLC

  • Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Giovanni Mauro Cattaneo, Ospedale San Raffaele, Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria, HS Raffaele, 20182 Milano, Italy.
  • ,
  • Italo Dell’Oca

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Sara Broggi

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudio Fiorino

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Lucia Perna

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Marcella Pasetti

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Giulia Sangalli

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Nadia di Muzio

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Ferruccio Fazio

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
    • INB-CNR, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy
  • ,
  • Riccardo Calandrino

      Affiliations

    • Medical Physics, University of Milano Bicocca, Milano, Italy

Received 30 April 2008; received in revised form 11 June 2008; accepted 19 June 2008. published online 11 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background and Purpose

To investigate the impact of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) upon the dose distribution when compared to our routinely delivered 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in the case of patients affected by stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Material and methods

Thirteen stage III inoperable NSCLC patients were scheduled to receive 61.2–70.2Gy, 1.8Gy/fraction. Two treatment techniques (HT and CRT) were considered, and in the case of CRT the dose calculation was performed using both the pencil beam (PB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) available on the Varian Eclipse planning system. Dose volume constraints for PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed for the HT inverse planning with the highest priority upon PTV coverage and spinal cord sparing. The three plans were compared in terms of dose–volume histograms (DVHs) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). A statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests.

Results

In CRT the use of a less accurate algorithm (PB) decreased the monitor unit number by 2.4%. HT significantly improved dose homogeneity within PTV compared with CRT_AAA. For lung parenchyma V20–V40 were lower with HT, corresponding to a decrease of 7% in the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The volume of the heart and esophagus irradiated to >45–60Gy were reduced using HT plans. For eight PTs with an esophagus–PTV overlap >5%, HT significantly reduced both late and acute esophageal complication probability.

Conclusions

Our findings obtained in stage III NSCLC patients underline that HT guarantees an important sparing of lungs and esophagus, thus HT has the potential to improve therapeutic ratio, when compared with CRT, by means of dose escalation and/or combined treatment strategy.

In CRT of locally advanced lung cancers, the use of a more advanced algorithm would give significantly better modeling of target dose and coverage.

Keywords: Non-small-cell lung cancer, Radiotherapy, Intensity modulation, Three-dimensional conformal, NTCP

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(08)00333-2

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.006

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 88, Issue 3 , Pages 310-318, September 2008