Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 156-163, November 2008

Consequences of random and systematic reconstruction uncertainties in 3D image based brachytherapy in cervical cancer

  • Kari Tanderup

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • ,
  • Taran Paulsen Hellebust

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Physics, Rikshospital-Radiumhopital Health Trust, Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Stefan Lang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Jørgen Granfeldt

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • ,
  • Richard Pötter

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  • ,
  • Jacob Christian Lindegaard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • ,
  • Christian Kirisits

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Christian Kirisits, Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A – 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Received 25 October 2007; received in revised form 16 June 2008; accepted 19 June 2008. published online 11 August 2008.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of random and systematic applicator reconstruction uncertainties on DVH parameters in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Material and methods

Dose plans were analysed for 20 cervical cancer patients with MRI based brachytherapy. Uncertainty of applicator reconstruction was modelled by translating and rotating the applicator. Changes in DVH parameters per mm of applicator displacement were evaluated for GTV, CTV, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. These data were used to derive patient population based estimates of delivered dose relative to expected dose.

Results

Deviations of DVH parameters depend on direction of reconstruction uncertainty. The most sensitive organs are rectum and bladder where mean DVH parameter shifts are 5–6% per mm applicator displacement in ant–post direction. For other directions and other DVH parameters, mean shifts are below 4% per mm. By avoiding systematic reconstruction errors, uncertainties on DVH parameters can be kept below 10% in 90% of a patient population. Systematic errors of a few millimetres can lead to significant deviations.

Conclusion

Comprehensive quality control of afterloader, applicators and imaging procedures should be applied to prevent systematic errors in applicator reconstruction. Random errors should be minimised by using small slice thickness. With careful reconstruction procedures, reliable DVH parameters for target and OAR’s can be obtained.

Keywords: Brachytherapy, 3D image guidance, Applicator reconstruction, DVH, Uncertainties

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(08)00330-7

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.010

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 89, Issue 2 , Pages 156-163, November 2008