Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 168-175, November 2006

Dosimetric pre-treatment verification of IMRT using an EPID; clinical experience

Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 4 November 2005; received in revised form 7 September 2006; accepted 22 September 2006. published online 23 October 2006.

Abstract 

Background and purpose

In our clinic a QA program for IMRT verification, fully based on dosimetric measurements with electronic portal imaging devices (EPID), has been running for over 3 years. The program includes a pre-treatment dosimetric check of all IMRT fields. During a complete treatment simulation at the linac, a portal dose image (PDI) is acquired with the EPID for each patient field and compared with a predicted PDI. In this paper, the results of this pre-treatment procedure are analysed, and intercepted errors are reported. An automated image analysis procedure is proposed to limit the number of fields that need human intervention in PDI comparison.

Materials and methods

Most of our analyses are performed using the γ index with 3% local dose difference and 3mm distance to agreement as reference values. Scalar parameters are derived from the γ values to summarize the agreement between measured and predicted 2D PDIs. Areas with all pixels having γ values larger than one are evaluated, making decisions based on clinically relevant criteria more straightforward.

Results

In 270 patients, the pre-treatment checks revealed four clinically relevant errors. Calculation of statistics for a group of 75 patients showed that the patient-averaged mean γ value inside the field was 0.43±0.13 (1SD) and only 6.1±6.8% of pixels had a γ value larger than one. With the proposed automated image analysis scheme, visual inspection of images can be avoided in 2/3 of the cases.

Conclusion

EPIDs may be used for high accuracy and high resolution routine verification of IMRT fields to intercept clinically relevant dosimetric errors prior to the start of treatment. For the majority of fields, PDI comparison can fully rely on an automated procedure, avoiding excessive workload.

Keywords: Quality assurance, Intensity modulated radiotherapy, EPID, Portal dosimetry

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(06)00486-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.09.008

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 81, Issue 2 , Pages 168-175, November 2006