Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 86, Issue 2 , Pages 251-257, February 2008

Evaluating target coverage and normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant radiotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: Helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT

  • Florian Sterzing

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Florian Sterzing, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • ,
  • Gabriele Sroka-Perez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Kai Schubert

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Marc W. Münter

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Christian Thieke

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Peter Huber

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Jürgen Debus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • ,
  • Klaus K. Herfarth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Germany

Received 25 February 2007; received in revised form 8 December 2007; accepted 11 December 2007. published online 21 January 2008.

Abstract 

Purpose

To evaluate the potential of helical tomotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma and compare target homogeneity, conformity and normal tissue dose with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Methods and materials

Ten patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and permetrexed followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) were treated in our department with 54Gy to the hemithorax delivered by step-and-shoot IMRT. A planning comparison was performed by creating radiation plans for helical tomotherapy. The different plans were compared by analysing target homogeneity using the homogeneity indices HImax and HImin and target conformity by using the conformity index CI95. To assess target coverage and normal tissue sparing TV90, TV95 and mean and maximum doses were compared.

Results

Both modalities achieved excellent dose distributions while sparing organs at risk. Target coverage and homogeneity could be increased significantly with helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT. Mean dose to the contralateral lung could be lowered beyond 5Gy.

Conclusions

Our planning study showed that helical tomotherapy is an excellent option for the adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy of MPM. It is capable of improving target coverage and homogeneity.

Keywords: MPM, Mesothelioma, Step-and-shoot IMRT, Helical tomotherapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0167-8140(07)00661-5

doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.010

Radiotherapy & Oncology
Volume 86, Issue 2 , Pages 251-257, February 2008